Sleeping in a tad yesterday (my ‘day off’) I overheard a radio chat show featuring South African politics and economics. Input came from Clem Sunter (Anglo American Chairman, Strategist, Futurist) and Andre Duvenhage (Political Scientist, Social Transformation Researcher). Sunter punted the need for foxes rather than hedgehogs: hedgehogs have just one mind-set, never change their minds because they like to think they are in control; foxes are quick-witted, adaptable (to changing environments), embrace uncertainty and know they are never fully in control.
Against the backdrop of the momentous events that have rocked global financial markets since September 2008 and the uncertain future of current SA politics and economics, Sunter calls for the empowering of multitudes of business entrepeneurs (a-la-Nigeria) to overcome the challenges of huge unemployment and poverty in our country. He reminds us that China opened the door to entrepeneurship in 1978 to rapidly become the second largest economy in the world! For the hedgehog (read SA ideological economic control versus participative economy) anything that does not somehow relate to the hedgehog idea holds no relevance. Sunter warns in the words of Marx: if the masses are ignored, expect a revolution!
On a personal note, whenever I get to chat to those in business, they tell me of a shift from the heavy top-down ‘my way or the high way’ approach to communicating with their employees on a shop-floor level and leading them with personal integrity. My very limited reading on this subject seems to confirm this trend.
I guess the Church of Jesus Christ, biblically speaking, should be ‘hedgehog-like’ in her proclamation of the Gospel of the Kingdom, discipling all nations so that God may be glorified in His universe. However, in spirit and strategy and practical adaptability (not theological), the Church should be ‘fox-like.’ Think of Jesus and his servant-leadership mentoring of twelve ragamuffins (not forgetting the women who followed him closely): not for Him highly organised structures or a cooky-cutter approach. Think of Paul the apostle to the Gentiles in 1 Cor. 9:19ff, ‘Though I am free and belong to no man, I make myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. To the Jews I became a Jew to win the Jews… to the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some. I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings.’ Think of the early Church which, as described in Acts, became a revival ‘out of control’: ordinary people by all kinds of ordinary means under the Spirit achieving the impossible and turning the world upside down (for the first 300 years there were no hierarchical structures, specialist leaders and buildings and controlled environments). Think of the 18th century evangelical awakenings under George Whitefield and John Wesley, the open-air preaching, the fellowship of small class meetings, the spread of the gospel through butchers, bakers and candlestick-makers. Think of the modern-day Chinese revival, where the house church movement has resurrected the Church from near-death (under Chairman Mao) to a vital Body numbering one hundred million ‘plus’ and fast becoming an incubator for the evangelization of the least-reached nations of the world.
And yet the institutional-traditional Church bumbles along, with massive membership losses year after year, banging her head against the same walls while expecting a different result. Often this body does not even consider that ‘authentic’ Church can actually happen outside traditional, denominational and hierarchical boundaries.
Praise God for and pray for the acceleration of organic, simple, family-centred, Christ-headed and empowered churches burgeoning across the globe! I believe with all my heart that this, under God, is what will win the day in the face of our common enemy and a tsunami of evil.